Re: Prologue Civilizations

by **peugeot407** Sun 22 Aug 2010 - 20:27

How exactly do you mean that?

peugeot407

by Ever121 Sun 22 Aug 2010 - 20:29

I mean that Egypt build buildings a little bit faster. Maybe giving them one light infantry unit when they create a military building (like British manor houses provide settlers when build). But a agriculture bonus would be great to, because they indeed had a good agriculture.

by **spangopola** Mon 23 Aug 2010 - 20:49

Sorry guys, my comp suffered internet problems a few days ago. That's why i am on hiatus these few days.

Anyway, I suggest we go with the agriculture bonus. It's more accurate.

by **spangopola** Wed 1 Sep 2010 - 13:14

I am wondering with the progress of KnB.... How's the texturing and RM going?

by **shadowflame** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 1:59

hehehe well my texture is finished but i tried something new with it and i'm kinda unsure of how it will look so i don't want to send it to peugoet because of those fears. Razz

by **peugeot407** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 2:11

You do realise that means you'll have to code it yourself??? Razz

(not that that's such a particularly bad thing)

peugeot407

by **spangopola** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 3:18

Suggestion. Peugeot, it'll be nice if we got a 'Queueueueueueuueueue' topic here, too. Razz

The one where we post what we've done, what we're working atm, and what we will work on in the future.

by **peugeot407** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 3:33

Good idea, and for that I'll leave you to create it...

peugeot407

by **spangopola** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 4:09

Done. I suddenly feel General II-ish.

by **peugeot407** Thu 2 Sep 2010 - 4:26

There's reason to... Wink

peugeot407

by **Persian_Fusilier** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 4:20

Please add seljuke persians Very Happy

its possible....

by **peugeot407** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 4:26

Persians are a subciv, actually... The Seljuks are included in our Turks civ, even though that focuses more on the later Ottomans.

peugeot407

by **iliander** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 5:07

How stupid of me... I forgot to tell Persian Fusilier that the Persians are going to be a Native Settlement, since he asked me why we didn't add them as a civ.

@PF: Sorry for that. Wink

by **Persian_Fusilier** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 5:28

Persian turks were not sub civil of ottoman turks, ottoman turks were subcivil of seljuks!!!. persian turks called "Azeri".
they had a big territory.
And @iliander: no problem my friend Wink

. but i think seljuks are larger than Native Settlement.

by **peugeot407** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 5:31

Thát empire is part of our Turks civ. The Persian subciv are the Sassanids.

peugeot407

by **iliander** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 5:38

@ Persian Fusilier:

Barbarians Settlements are meant to be "Empires of Old". They can't be a separate civ, because they flourished earlier in time, which is exactly what K&B needs as "natives". Maybe in the far future, when our mod will start creating offsprings including new civs such as the Persian Empire. But those chances are small.

by **Persian_Fusilier** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 7:03

Yes, Persian Empires were never part of ottomans . but as you wish... Very Happy

by **peugeot407** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 7:38

Oh no, we're not saying that. "Subcivs" is the coding name of what were called "Natives" in unmodded AoE3.

peugeot407

by **Persian_Fusilier** Tue 20 Mar 2012 - 9:15

oh. ok

by **Pepp** Fri 23 Mar 2012 - 1:04

Let Pepp say Subciv=Native=Barbarian=Old Empire.

And PF, as you're squire, why don't you try to posting something in the team secret forum? Or you haven't be able to do that?

by **Persian_Fusilier** Fri 23 Mar 2012 - 8:58

oh ,i was tried many time there big problems Shocked

that iliander know. its make me angry . but i promise show my works...
i love to show them to team too.

by Sponsored content